Search results for query: *

my 3v is pretty quick compared to stock making about 510rwhp but doesn't feel like it is much faster or faster than my 14 gt with fbo

did the delete plates and stock cams ended up going from 544whp was the max tune with my cams but tuned down to 507 now stock cams back in and delete plates and got 483whp w/ boostane 507 and went from 430wtq to 420 dyno graphs across the board untill 5k was the same as with the cms cams and...

what was your power numbers with the boost that high? doubt the boost did it had to be tuned for to much power

I thought they lost low mid tq everyone says cams do but after going back to the dyno with stock cams thats not the case stock cams lost about 50whp low end was the same needless to say im pissed lol

anyone using boostane with 93 ? if so did it make anymore power etc?

i went back to stock cams to reclaim low and mid end power blower makes plenty of top end. i am putting it on the dyno tomorrow see how much i lost peak going back to stock

these are some nice numbers good to see cars stay strong

stock engine? thats a alot of torque everyone seems to say 450wtq is the limit

yeh i was thinking keeping it around 450 and limiting rpms to around 6300 or lower

im using a paxton intercooled making around 500whp tuner tells me its to much for a stock engine so curious what everyone else was pushing etc

I wanted peoples stock engine boosted 3v info seeing what everyone is using type of forced induction how much whp/tq how much boost what mods at/mt result still running or blown motor thanks!

just went through this replaced the front struts and mounts no more noise

Bringing this back from the dead but did anyone run the 3.125 pulley on a stock engine 3v?? Is it to much boost or can it be detuned to be safe

i think i would around 13psi max rpm hoping they can detune the car if that would make to much power but help low to mid psi for me

So before I get a new dyno tune I'm debating on going from a 3.33 pulley to a 3.25 or 3.125 wondering if it help make a little more boost at every rpm while obviously adding more at peak rpm thoughts?

nah dyno tune by my tuner is the best its winter time so don't drive the car much lito i had when i was na and never could get my tune right

well cams back to stock and delete plates running a brenspeed email tune car seems to pull better in the low end but ill know for sure when i get my dyno tune in april

whats your thoughts on the stock tb vs ford 62mm tb is it worth it?

so lower rpm street driving should be better?

have not been to a track car is a nice weather weekend car not really for racing etc. i would like to get up there one day and see

you see the kink in the curve what is that from the cams?? if i pushed it to 6700 rpm id be over 550whp but the rods are weak and i dont drive in that rpm range i was hoping to see more down low than i got with paxton didnt expect roots type low but better than what it is

here is my current dyno chart mods are cams/long tubes catted x/ paxton 1200sl intercooled 3.33 pulley/4.10 gears manual car it was detuned from 544/474 above 4800 is where it got more power otherwise both look the same posted my dyno graph take a look let me know if you see if the cams...

well just got the delete plates and going to put stock cams back in get another dyno tune hope that improves low to mid performance

doesn't the cmcv help with low end torque? i dont want to lose any if i go back to stock cams as thats where i do most of my driving i love the sound of my cams but i guess losing that low end is bothering me since the blower makes plenty up top