Recent content by Lazy Racer

Ive trashed lakewoods lower and upper control arms, no reply from them on either case. I now use BMR billet lowers and stock upper. Im planning on making my own upper to get better adjustment. Good luck with lakewood, I gave up ages back

That sounds pretty heavyweight to me

Yup, the blower is definately different. But, so is the gearbox, thats an auto judging by the shifter, the 'last one' had a Liberty 6060. I wonder if any of the dash electronics on top of the steering column will find its way into the parts catalogue...?

Will do, it'll be next week. Thanks.

I dont think its massively out for those mods, its mainly the CAI, delete plates and headers; its possible that stock it has 265 so 35whp is not a bad gain...45crank?

YUP:thumb2:

Thanks Matt, Ive been using your tunes for years so you should have no worries finding me. sn SCT3915133957 Rev 1.15 CDC3 I suppose the tune data is input via the software on a laptop and uploaded to the car via the sct unit and the cable I use for data logging?...

phuckin hell, thats a lot of weight. A HUGE amount IF that 70lbs excludes the weight reduction in using the tubular K and rad delete etc. Im keen to go with the QA1 coil over kit and some lighter brakes too (not drag brakes but lighter street brakes). I am very impressed with the QA1's I have...

Thats the best news Ive had all year. A guy I know has a dynotech 2400hp roller and is a UK FAST dealer so looks like Im going to be spending some time with him! Thanks for your input, appreciated

Im in the UK and so far have always had canned tunes. reason for thisis because the dyno guys over here cannot tune Mustangs. I have no idea why! So, what software is required on a dyno to tune a Mustang? ... I dont get why they can tune just about any other car but not a Ford Mustang...

It seems there is not a huge amount of weight to be got rid of, the pinto rack is a few pounds lighter but I guess the plumbing that comes out takes a bit out too. I tend to drift when i race as Im focussing on shifting and rpms. My thoughts are I might go a bit straighter too! Bad luck on the...

I am running a 4.10 with 28" wheels; manual tr3650, 100 shot. On the 12.16 @ 11 run, I ran a 1.64 60', 90.5 in the 1/8th @ 7.75.

Will do, thanks. By the way, did you have the grudge race with the CJ? How did it go?

Id agree with all of that. I have 68k on ine and Im speccing a new long block, fuel etc.

On the KB site they mention 455whp. I think the stock heads are very good and can handle 550 crank no probs, rpm dependant; issue here is the valve train- if the power adder/cams you use to bump up to say 550 (450whp approx) increases max rpm, you may get some valve lift/issues. Its best to sort...