jodadejss06gt
TEAM DELETE SHIT
Hey guys, I've been toying with the idea of trying to get Manuel to tune for a blend of pump 93 and pump E85 to ~ E50. I remember seeing discussion about E50 before but couldn't remember where and not this in depth.
ONeff = Effective Octane Number
From this thesis done by a student at MIT. Based on the summary(pg.117), it states "ONeff. (chemical) benefit from blending ethanol is non-linear. No benefit beyond ~30-40% ethanol by volume. As seen from the figure, the ONeff of the gasoline-ethanol blend is initially significantly improved with increasing ethanol content up until around 30-40% by volume. Increasing ethanol content further does not improve ONeff any more. What the result is implying is that Ethanol blending provides no antiknock benefit beyond 30-40% by volume, unless it is used in an engine that can realize the charge cooling potential of the fuel.
What I get out of the article: the more ethanol you put into the fuel, the better the charge air cooling benefits, which improve anti-knock properties. However, chemically speaking E85 has very little benefit of anti knock properties over say a mixture of 40% ethanol.
Here is the link to the 134 page article. Some of it is well beyond my understanding!
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...G1MbGRWeSVL_eg
Page 18 shows the chart of Mixtures and their A/F stoich.
E0 = 14.7
E10 = 14.1
E20 = 13.5
E50 = 11.8
E85 = 9.8
E100 = 9.0
It also shows how much Energy is in the fuel.
Based on my calcs, if you have 30% less energy in E85 than E10, you only have ~ 15% less energy in E50 than E10.
My sole purpose is to extend my tank range on E50 while still being able to lay the hammer down with higher boost on my 11:1 compression engine.
ONeff = Effective Octane Number
From this thesis done by a student at MIT. Based on the summary(pg.117), it states "ONeff. (chemical) benefit from blending ethanol is non-linear. No benefit beyond ~30-40% ethanol by volume. As seen from the figure, the ONeff of the gasoline-ethanol blend is initially significantly improved with increasing ethanol content up until around 30-40% by volume. Increasing ethanol content further does not improve ONeff any more. What the result is implying is that Ethanol blending provides no antiknock benefit beyond 30-40% by volume, unless it is used in an engine that can realize the charge cooling potential of the fuel.
What I get out of the article: the more ethanol you put into the fuel, the better the charge air cooling benefits, which improve anti-knock properties. However, chemically speaking E85 has very little benefit of anti knock properties over say a mixture of 40% ethanol.
Here is the link to the 134 page article. Some of it is well beyond my understanding!
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sour...G1MbGRWeSVL_eg
Page 18 shows the chart of Mixtures and their A/F stoich.
E0 = 14.7
E10 = 14.1
E20 = 13.5
E50 = 11.8
E85 = 9.8
E100 = 9.0
It also shows how much Energy is in the fuel.
Based on my calcs, if you have 30% less energy in E85 than E10, you only have ~ 15% less energy in E50 than E10.
My sole purpose is to extend my tank range on E50 while still being able to lay the hammer down with higher boost on my 11:1 compression engine.