crownaviation
http://www.tudyno.com/
That's because she has different plans.
Lol! Got the pump in and it flows (by visual indications) MUCH better than that crappy Rule 2000 that was rated at 33.3 gpm. Will get a pic up later of the install. The "other" pump was rated at 33.3 gpm.. but, that is only at 13.6V and open flow (probably optimum conditions). The other pump was rated to 200F which the coolant would never reach. Still, that has an affect on the output of the pump as well. The Meziere is a nice piece for sure. Not sure under what conditions Meziere tested the flow but obviously it is manufactured for this purpose. I will need to go back and look but think I read the Meziere was also rated to a much higher temp also.
My IAT's are actually about the same as before my pump failed under similar driving conditions, maybe slightly lower but not significant (compared to the "33" gpm pump when it was working). The real benefit I noticed with the better flow was when I stuffed ice in the tank last night at the track. With the ice I had temps down the track at WOT down to 128*. Without the ice I had temps up to 184* with the same cooling period between passes. My tune pulls timing around 136* IIRC. Although there could be a many differences in track conditions between the passes, and how well the car hooked etc, but the timeslips on the two were 11.74 on ice (no timing pulled) and 12.01 without the ice and the tune pulling timing. Same lane etc. Yes, temp matters... even if the difference in .20 on a 1/4 mile pass due to timing etc.. that is still quite a bit.
Track conditions last night on the passes were: 87*F, Dew Point 65*F (humid), 3600' density altitude with a little headwind. The second pass without the ice DA was just over 3400'.
Last edited: